Guides

The 1% rule is napkin math. What to check instead

The 1% rule says a rental is worth a look if the monthly rent is at least 1% of the price: $1,500 a month for a $150,000 house. It's quick, and that's its only virtue. It says nothing about the costs, which can differ by thousands of dollars a year between two houses with the same rent. Here are two houses where the rule gets it backwards.

1. Two houses, two verdicts

Both are bought with 25% down and a 30-year loan at 7.25%, with one point and 2.5% closing costs. Both assume rents rise 3% a year and values 3% a year, and both are held for 10 years. Only the house and its costs differ.

House AHouse B
Price$140,000, plus $8,000 of repairs$300,000
Monthly rent$1,450$2,600
Rent ÷ price1.04%: passes0.87%: fails
Property tax2.0% of the price ($2,800 a year)0.6% ($1,800 a year)
Insurance$2,200 a year$1,300 a year
Vacancy, maintenance, big-repair reserve and management, as % of rent10%, 10%, 12%, 10% (an older house)5%, 5%, 6%, 8% (a newer house)

What the Rental Property Analyzer makes of them:

House AHouse B
Cash flow after all costs and the mortgage−$230 a month+$227 a month
Cap rate5.1%7.5%
Cash-on-cash return−5.8%3.2%
Debt coverage (DSCR)0.901.25
Return over 10 years, after tax (IRR)2.6%10.4%
Rent needed just to break even$1,826 (1.30% of the price)$2,305 (0.77% of the price)

The house that passes the rule loses $230 a month. To break even it would need rent of 1.30% of its price. The house that fails the rule pays its way, and would still break even at 0.77%. If those terms are new, our guide to cap rate, cash-on-cash, DSCR and IRR explains each one.

2. Why: the costs the rule can't see

3. It's the costs, not the house

To prove the point, swap the cost assumptions. Give House A the costs of a typical, average-condition house (1.1% property tax, $1,650 insurance, and 6%, 6%, 8% and 9% for vacancy, repairs, reserve and management). It turns to +$85 a month and an 8.5% return after tax. Give House B those same typical costs and it slips to −$47 a month, with a 7.4% return.

Same prices, same rents, and the verdicts flip on cost lines the 1% rule never looks at.

4. What else the rule misses

5. What to check instead

  1. Get the real fixed costs: the property tax at your purchase price, an insurance quote, and any HOA dues.
  2. Budget honestly for the variable costs: vacancy, repairs, a reserve for big replacements, and management, even if you plan to manage it yourself.
  3. Work out cash flow after the mortgage and all of those, not before.
  4. Check the debt coverage, which shows how much room you have if rent falls or costs rise.
  5. Run the stress tests: a higher rate, lower rent, more vacancy, higher costs.

Use the 1% rule, if at all, to sort listings, never to decide. In these examples, even the low-cost house needed rent of about 0.77% of its price just to break even at a 7.25% rate, so a listing far below that is unlikely to pay its way with a loan. A house over 1% still has to pass every step above.

Try it with your numbers

Open House A or House B in the Rental Property Analyzer, then replace the numbers with a listing you're looking at. Its scorecard shows the rent-to-price ratio next to the numbers that matter, and its stress tests show what would break the deal. It runs in your browser and we don't store your numbers.

These are made-up examples, not real listings. Your taxes, insurance and costs will differ.

Screenshot of the Rental Property Analyzer Run your own numbers Rental Property Analyzer Long-term vs short-term rental: cash flow, returns and taxes, side by side. Open the tool →